ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Prefrontal and Cerebellar Contributions to Semantic Memory Retrieval.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semantic memory retrieval is essential for language, thought, and adaptive behavior. Although both the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the cerebellum have been implicated in this function, the role of the PFC remains poorly understood and the contribution of the cerebellum largely overlooked in current neurocognitive models. To address these gaps, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled experiment in which healthy adults received anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the left lateral PFC, the right posterior cerebellum, or sham stimulation. Participants completed a novel process-sensitive paradigm comprising lexical decision, free-associative (FA; automatic) retrieval, dissociative (DA; controlled) retrieval, and intrusion monitoring, while manipulating response predictability and rule switching. Cerebellar tDCS selectively impaired FA performance, particularly for cues evoking predictable responses, supporting its role in automatic access to overlearned associations. In contrast, prefrontal tDCS disrupted DA performance and increased associative intrusions, implicating the PFC in retrieval inhibition. Importantly, mediation analysis showed that the reduction in DA fluency was largely explained by higher probability of intrusions, indicating a perturbation of proactive inhibitory control that normally prevents irrelevant memory activations from entering working memory. Further exploratory analyses ruled out several alternative accounts of these stimulation effects, underscoring their process specificity. Together, these findings advance models of semantic cognition by demonstrating complementary contributions of the cerebellum to automatic retrieval and of the PFC to inhibitory control over intrusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.