ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
A comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging image-based deep learning and conventional turbo spin echo sequence in tumor-node staging of rectal cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate tumor-node (TN) staging of rectal cancer is crucial for treatment planning. Conventional turbo spin echo (TSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is time-consuming and limited by image quality. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance, staging accuracy, and acquisition time of deep learning-reconstructed TSE (DL TSE) with conventional TSE (conv TSE) in rectal cancer MRI. Methods: From October 2023 to October 2024, 60 patients with rectal tumors were prospectively enrolled following diagnosis at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. All participants underwent MRI scanning and TN staging by DL TSE and conv TSE, and a comparison was made using the McNemar's test and Kappa test. Results: In TN staging diagnosis, DL TSE sequences performed significantly better than conv TSE sequences. By applying DL reconstruction to T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) TSE sequences, T staging accuracy was improved from 0.778 to 0.907, and N staging accuracy was improved from 0.703 to 0.926. In the T-stage assessment, McNemar's test showed for conv TSE (χ Conclusions: The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DL TSE sequences for rectal cancer TN staging were higher than those of conv TSE. The DL TSE sequence (including T1WI and T2WI) results for TN staging of rectal cancer were close to the pathological diagnosis, indicating a high clinical application for TN staging of rectal cancer. DL TSE can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce scanning time by 36.6%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.