Evidence mapPaperPMID 41972049Full record

ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Foundation models for X-ray interpretation: a narrative review of current techniques and future perspectives in diagnostic imaging.

Isah Salim Ahmad, Rabiatu Bako Suleiman, Tian Yu, Rongbo Lin, Cailei Zhao, Jianxiang Liao, Benqing Wu, Yaoqin Xie, Xiaokun Liang, Haifeng Wang and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isah Salim AhmadDepartment of Pediatric, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology General Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Rabiatu Bako SuleimanShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Tian YuDepartment of Pediatric, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology General Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Rongbo LinDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Cailei ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jianxiang LiaoDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Benqing WuDepartment of Pediatric, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology General Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yaoqin XieShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaokun LiangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Haifeng WangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Zhanqi HuDepartment of Pediatric, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology General Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The scarcity of high-quality annotated data is a primary bottleneck in developing artificial intelligence (AI) for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation. Foundation models (FMs), trained on broad datasets via self-supervision, present a transformative solution. This narrative review analyzes the current state of vision and vision-language foundation models (VLFMs) specifically for CXR, evaluating their potential to bridge research and clinical practice through a novel analytical framework. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a narrative review of literature from 2021-2025. We introduced and applied a novel four-pillar analytical taxonomy to structure the field: (I) core model architecture; (II) training framework; (III) clinical application adaptation; and (IV) quality assurance (QA). This framework guided the synthesis of evidence from over 150 studies, enabling a structured analysis of model designs, training paradigms, adaptation strategies, and evaluation metrics. Key Content and Findings: The four-pillar taxonomy provides a critical lens to deconstruct the FM development pipeline. Our analysis reveals distinct maturity levels across pillars: while architectural innovation and training strategies are advanced, rigorous QA and adaptation for real-world heterogeneity (e.g., portable Conclusions: CXR-FMs offer a path toward more generalizable and data-efficient diagnostic AI. However, successful clinical translation is contingent upon coordinated advances across all four pillars of the proposed framework, moving beyond architectural scaling to prioritize data diversity, robustness auditing, and seamless workflow integration. This taxonomy provides researchers and clinicians with an actionable framework to develop and evaluate models whose impact will be determined by demonstrated fairness, reliability, and utility in diverse clinical environments.

Indexed as

chest X-ray imaging (CXR imaging)diagnostic artificial intelligence (diagnostic AI)Foundation models (FMs)self-supervised learning (SSL)vision language models

Identifiers

PMID41972049
PMCPMC13066860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.