ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Incidence, outcomes and risk factors of rebound neurological deterioration after initial improvement following intravenous thrombolysis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In clinical practice, a substantial number of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients experience neurological deterioration following by initial early neurological improvement (ENI) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), a pattern we define as rebound neurological deterioration (REND). However, the incidence and clinical implications of REND remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective study included AIS patients who achieved ENI, defined as ≥ 4-point reduction of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to 2 h after IVT. REND was defined as a ≥ 2-point increase in NIHSS score within 24 h from last known well, occurring after ENI and in the absence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The association between REND and functional outcomes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression models and the independent risk factors of REND were identified through backward stepwise selection. Results: A total of 1,025 AIS patients were screened in this retrospective study and 277 patients experienced ENI following IVT were included in the analysis. REND occurred in 19.9% of patients, which was negatively associated with favorable functional outcomes [adjusted OR (95%CI): 0.076 (0.031, 0.186), Conclusion: REND occurred in approximately one-fifth of AIS patients with ENI after IVT and was strongly associated with poor functional outcomes. Younger age, history of hypertension, and large vessel occlusion or severe stenosis were independent risk factors of REND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.