ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Pulsed electromagnetic field effectively improves musculoskeletal degeneration and inflammation levels in a rat model of osteosarcopenia: an experimental study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insufficient protein synthesis significantly contributes to the metabolic imbalance between muscle and bone, serving as a primary factor in the concurrent deterioration of both muscle and bone structure and function in the elderly. Increasing evidences suggest that Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) can enhance the recovery process of bones and muscles as a non-invasive and highly specific intervention, thereby offering potential treatment options for osteoporosis and sarcopenia. However, the application of PEMF in the treatment of Osteosarcopenia (OS) remains relatively underexplored, and the associated mechanisms have yet to be elucidated. Methods: Ovariectomy was performed on rats followed by intraperitoneal injection of excessive dexamethasone. After successful model establishment confirmed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, rats were subjected to 15 Hz, 2.0 mT PEMF intervention (five times per week for 12 weeks). Following the intervention, muscle mass and strength, bone microarchitecture, bone biomechanical strength, serum markers of osteogenic and myogenic differentiation, systemic inflammatory levels, skeletal muscle and bone tissue histomorphology, and protein expression were quantitatively assessed. These analyses were performed to elucidate the regulatory effects of PEMF on chronic musculoskeletal deterioration and circulating inflammatory levels. Results: We found that PEMF enhance the synthesis of osteogenic and myogenic proteins, leading to an increase in both the quantity and density of trabecular bone and myotubes. This intervention reduces the progression of bone loss and muscle atrophy while simultaneously improving the biological performance of muscle and bone. Moreover, PEMF treatment attenuated the systemic chronic inflammatory milieu, as evidenced by reduced circulating levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, although a complete restoration to baseline levels was not achieved. Conclusion: PEMF demonstrates therapeutic effects on OS by promoting the synthesis of key proteins involved in osteogenesis and myogenesis, thereby enhancing muscle function and bone strength, while also suppressing the systemic chronic inflammatory microenvironment. These findings provide experimental evidence supporting PEMF as a potential non-pharmacological intervention strategy for OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.