ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Disability and Employment Inclusion in a Transforming Economy: Epidemiological Evidence from National Survey Data.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Employment inclusion for persons with disabilities is a critical public-health and social-justice priority. In Saudi Arabia, the intersection of disability, gender, and national reform under Vision 2030 presents unique challenges and opportunities for equitable labour participation. This study examined employment patterns, structural determinants, and potential policy pathways to enhance inclusion among Saudis with disabilities. A cross-sectional analytical design was applied using nationally representative data from the 2017 Saudi Disability Survey (n = 1 312 261 working-age individuals). Employment status served as the dependent variable, while severity, difficulty scope, sex, marital status, and access to Ministry of Labor and Social Development (MLSD) services were predictors. Weighted descriptive statistics and grouped logistic regression were used to identify correlates of employment, followed by counterfactual simulations estimating potential gains under alternative policy scenarios. National employment among persons with disabilities was 18.5%, with pronounced disparities by gender and severity. Men were 2.6 times more likely than women to be employed (AOR = 2.64,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.