ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Discrimination, Racism, and Structural Determinants in Youth Violence Prevention Programs: A Scoping Review and Intervention Component Analysis.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Structural Approaches to Youth Violence Prevention: Addressing Racism and Discrimination.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review maps youth violence prevention studies (1990-2025) that explicitly incorporate discrimination, racism, or structural terms in titles/abstracts, categorizes violence outcomes, and analyzes interventions with components specifically designed to address these factors. From 1034 unique records across a multi-disciplinary group of eight databases, a very small fraction of eligible studies that explicitly centered and named discrimination-related concepts was identified (n = 14). Among these, the use of "discrimination" and "structural" terminology was most salient. Violence outcomes were inconsistently operationalized but most included subjective measures of youth problem behavior or aggression; objective outcome measures related to formalized offenses were moderately used. Five studies featured programs targeting discrimination, racism, or structural determinants and qualified for intervention component analysis (ICA). Most of the studies leveraged multicomponent interventions, but reporting on change mechanisms varied widely. This review highlights a gap between rhetoric around the role of discrimination and structural factors in youth violence and how interventions are designed, indexed, and evaluated. Our ICA findings suggest practical models for embedding discrimination or structural components in prevention programs. Rather than identifying all programs impacting these factors, this review maps those explicitly focused on them. Findings urge funders, journals, and leaders to prioritize evaluations which clearly articulate how prevention interventions address upstream drivers of youth violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41973184What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.