ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Navigating Medication Risk in the ED: Communication Preferences of Older Adults Regarding Deprescribing.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Among Older Adults Seeking Care in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPatients and experts agree that potentially inappropriate medications should be reconsidered after adverse drug events (ADEs), yet emergency providers are often hesitant to discuss deprescribing in deference to outpatient prescribers. We sought to explore patient communication preferences for deprescribing in the emergency department (ED) after an ADE.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey study of older adults aged 65 years and older presenting to a southeastern, academic ED from June 2024 to October 2024. While awaiting results, eligible participants completed a best-worst scaling survey comparing seven potential ED communication strategies for prompting deprescription of daily aspirin. The primary analysis tested whether an ED-initiated "therapeutic pause" ("Considering your bleeding, I would like you to hold your aspirin until you can discuss with your primary care provider") was preferred by > 50% of participants over a generic discharge referral to a primary care provider through a one-sided binomial test. Secondary analyses used conditional logistic regression to evaluate relative preference across all seven deprescribing phrases.
resultsIn total, 102 patients completed the survey with a mean (SD) age of 75 years old (std dev 7). Among all respondents, 62% (95% CI, 52%-71%) preferred an ED-initiated 'therapeutic pause' of aspirin with primary care follow-up to the generic PCP deferral approach (p = 0.01). The least preferred statement was a strict deprescribing recommendation ("I do not think you need aspirin anymore"), which was selected as the least-favored communication approach in 65% of choice tasks. In conditional logistic regression, the therapeutic pause had greater odds of being selected as most preferred compared to the least preferred phrase (OR 9.3; 95% CI, 6.3-13.8).
conclusionOur study suggests that ED physicians may take a proactive approach in addressing potential deprescribing in caring for patients with ADEs, such as initiating a therapeutic pause of aspirin after an episode of bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.