Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973505›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Emotion Expression in Breast Cancer Support Seeking: Empirical Study of an Online Community.

Anqi Xu, Ahmad Aljanaideh, Jennifer Xu, Haijing Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anqi XuDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7373-4687
Ahmad AljanaidehDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-1673-2237
Jennifer XuDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5615-9967
Haijing HaoDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3071-2538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer affects millions of women and presents not only medical challenges but also emotional, financial, and social burdens. Beyond clinical treatment, patients increasingly turn to online cancer communities (OCCs) for informational support, emotional support, and shared coping strategies. OCCs help patients manage daily life and reduce psychological distress through shared experiences and empathetic engagement. Within these communities, emotional expressions serve as critical cues through which patients communicate their situations and needs with other OCC members.

objectiveThis study explores the relationship between emotions expressed in patients' initial posts and community reactions and engagement in OCCs. Based on the emotions as social information (EASI) model and Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions, this study investigates whether different emotions function as distinct social signals that lead to different patterns of member response, and whether emotions defined as opposites elicit opposing or similar engagement behaviors.

methodsThis study examines how the 8 primary emotions expressed in an initial post-surprise, anticipation, joy, sadness, trust, disgust, fear, and anger-distinctively influence responses of members in OCCs. We collected data from a breast cancer community from 2002 to 2017 and analyzed 23,633 threads from 9137 patients with breast cancer. Using BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers), we extract emotion scores from patients' initial posts, measure community engagement across 5 response dimensions, and empirically analyze how different emotions are associated with user response behaviors.

resultsThe analysis shows that certain emotions, such as joy and anticipation, consistently elicit significant effects across all measured response categories (P<.001). Most other emotions, except disgust, also demonstrate significant effects in most categories (3 or 4 of 5 categories; P<.05). Consistent with the EASI perspective, different emotional expressions influence how community members allocate attention, effort, and timing in their responses in distinct ways. Moreover, for most pairs of opposite emotions (eg, surprise vs anticipation, joy vs sadness, and anger vs fear), the impacts on the 5 types of community responses move in parallel rather than opposite directions.

conclusionsBy integrating Plutchik's emotion framework with the EASI model, this study advances understanding of how emotional expressions function as social information and signals in OCCs. The findings show that emotions expressed in patients' initial posts influence community engagement not only through emotional valence, but also through the situational context that community members can infer from the initial posts. In addition, modeling emotions as continuous intensity scales helps reveal how emotional strength amplifies engagement across multiple dimensions, including participation, effort, timing, and topical relevance. These insights extend prior OCC research beyond polarity-based sentiment analysis and offer practical implications for patients, community platforms, and health care practitioners seeking to better support peer interaction and psychosocial care in digital health environments.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEmotionsSocial SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMiddle Agedbreast canceremotionmachine learningonline cancer communitypatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID41973505
PMCPMC13122135

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.