ReviewCommunications medicine2026
Understanding long-term physical and psychosocial outcomes from conflict to rehabilitation through the ADVANCE cohort.
Review in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout the history of conflict, medical advancements have improved people's survival. Many individuals sustain physical and mental scars, often unseen and impacting on future health. Improvements in clinical care are often translated into practice, but long-term health impacts may not be appreciated until later. Most post-conflict data related to health outcomes of military personnel are limited by retrospective methodologies examining isolated results or surrogate measures of health. The ADVANCE cohort aims to prospectively understand the long-term physical and psychosocial outcomes of conflict-injured UK Service personnel who served in Afghanistan compared to an uninjured comparison group. This review will outline cardiovascular, mental health and musculoskeletal findings in this cohort, discuss the evolution of the objectives to understand associated mechanisms and mediators, and demonstrate the initial impact and relevance for military and civilian populations worldwide. Finally, two participants reflect on their involvement in the ADVANCE cohort and its impact from their perspective.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.