ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Intensive care admissions in older adults: are we moving from ageism to ableism?
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcross Europe, the proportion of older adults is increasing, raising complex questions regarding intensive care unit (ICU) admission decisions in late life. As chronological age is no longer recommended alone as an ICU admission criterion, functional independence and frailty have gradually helped refine medical assessment of older adults and guiding decisions. We aimed to study chronological age's influence in ICU admission decisions and if and how functional independence and frailty scales are currently used in France.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of geriatricians, emergency physicians, and intensivists. Physicians' decision-making practices in critical situations were discussed. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis within a constructivist and empirical ethics framework.
resultsWe interviewed 15 geriatricians, 8 emergency physicians, and 9 intensivists. Chronological age continued to influence ICU admission decisions through references to life expectancy. Functional independence and frailty scales (ADL/IADL and CFS) were used to assess premorbid status, estimate prognosis, and facilitate interprofessional communication. However, scales sometimes functioned as decision-making shortcuts, reduced deliberation, and risked reinforcing self-fulfilling prophecies. Scores were also used to justify implicit value judgments, valuing functionally independent and fit patients and judging others to be less worthy of ICU admission.
conclusionChronological age continues to shape ICU admission decisions for older adults despite increasing reliance on functional independence and frailty scales. Though these provide structured decision-making support, their use may inadvertently embed normative assumptions about aging and functional independence. Greater reflexivity is needed to ensure patient-centered robust decision-making for older adults in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.