ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of analgesia on the response to a noxious stimulus in Norway lobsters (Nephrops norvegicus).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is evidence that decapod crustaceans have the capacity to experience aversive states associated with nociception, highlighting the need for humane treatment. Behavioural and physiological responses to nociceptive stimuli may be reduced with analgesic drugs, yet little is known for decapods about effective options. In this study, the impact of electric shock on behaviour and physiology was investigated in Norway lobsters. Behaviour was monitored from before the shock to two hours after, with and without drugs with analgesic properties. Haemolymph and nervous tissues were analysed for stress indicators, including lactate, glucose, and gene expression. Electric shock induced tail flipping responses, absent in sham groups, however this was significantly reduced in animals treated with a local anaesthetic and an analgesic; suggesting these responses were mediated by nociception. Aspirin and lidocaine were effective at reducing this shock-related behaviour, however aspirin injection increased grooming immediately after administration, with elevated haemolymph lactate and downregulated gene expression in ganglionic tissues. Overall, the acute shock stimulus did not produce long lasting effects, but both drugs reduced tail flipping during shock. These results underscore the potential of these drugs for laboratory use during invasive procedures, but also the broader ethical responsibility to incorporate welfare strategies in crustacean handling and stunning protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.