ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026
[Expert Consensus on Shared Decision-making in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ground-glass Opacity-featured Lung Adenocarcinoma].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the popularization of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, the detection rate of ground-glass opacity (GGO) has been continuously increasing. Ground-glass opacity-featured lung adenocarcinoma is mostly characterized by indolent biological behavior and favorable prognosis. However, its progression is uncertain and recommendations vary among guidelines. This places clinicians in a dilemma between timely intervention and avoiding overdiagnosis and overtreatment, while patients often suffer from follow-up anxiety and decision-making confusion. To standardize the whole-process management on an evidence-based basis and fully incorporate patient values, this expert consensus systematically reviews the entire procedure of GGO diagnosis and treatment, establishes shared decision-making between doctors and patients as the core principle, and emphasizes formulating management strategies by integrating patient values, life goals and risk preferences. The consensus covers key components including the starting and ending ages for screening, limitations of imaging diagnosis and indications for invasive diagnosis, indications and timing of surgery, strategies for sublobar resection and lymph node management, management of multiple GGOs, non-surgical alternative therapies, reliability of intraoperative frozen-section pathology, postoperative enhanced recovery and pain management, eligible populations for adjuvant therapy, and follow-up strategies. By promoting multidisciplinary collaboration and structured communication, this consensus aims to facilitate the transformation of the diagnosis and treatment model from disease-centered to patient value-centered, improve medical quality and patient satisfaction, reduce overtreatment, and promote doctor-patient harmony. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.