ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Utility of Colonoscopy After Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute diverticulitis (AD) is a common gastrointestinal condition that has seen a significant rise in incidence and prevalence, largely due to the aging population and the increasing prevalence of obesity. Historically, routine colonoscopy was recommended after every episode of AD, but recent studies and meta-analyses have questioned this practice. Evidence now supports a more selective approach, suggesting that colonoscopy should only be performed in patients with complicated AD, persistent alarm symptoms (abdominal pain, weight loss, altered bowel habits, blood in stool, or iron-deficiency anemia), or imaging findings suggestive of neoplasia. For uncomplicated AD without alarm symptoms, routine colonoscopy is not justified, as it may lead to unnecessary complications and overuse of healthcare resources. Current guidelines reflect this shift, recommending individualized decision-making based on the patient's clinical history and risk factors. Emerging non-invasive diagnostic tools, such as fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and artificial intelligence (AI)-based models, hold promise for improving risk stratification and potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures. This narrative review, based on a structured literature search, synthesizes the evolution of post-AD colonoscopy recommendations, presents current evidence, and highlights future research directions on alternative diagnostic methods and their potential to optimize patient care and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.