Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975762›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Utility of Colonoscopy After Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.

Miguel Suárez, Raquel Martínez, Ana M Torres, Jorge Mateo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel SuárezGastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Cuenca, 16004 Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-7449
Raquel MartínezGastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Cuenca, 16004 Cuenca, Spain.
Ana M TorresMedical Analysis Expert Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-9034
Jorge MateoMedical Analysis Expert Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), 45071 Toledo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute diverticulitis (AD) is a common gastrointestinal condition that has seen a significant rise in incidence and prevalence, largely due to the aging population and the increasing prevalence of obesity. Historically, routine colonoscopy was recommended after every episode of AD, but recent studies and meta-analyses have questioned this practice. Evidence now supports a more selective approach, suggesting that colonoscopy should only be performed in patients with complicated AD, persistent alarm symptoms (abdominal pain, weight loss, altered bowel habits, blood in stool, or iron-deficiency anemia), or imaging findings suggestive of neoplasia. For uncomplicated AD without alarm symptoms, routine colonoscopy is not justified, as it may lead to unnecessary complications and overuse of healthcare resources. Current guidelines reflect this shift, recommending individualized decision-making based on the patient's clinical history and risk factors. Emerging non-invasive diagnostic tools, such as fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and artificial intelligence (AI)-based models, hold promise for improving risk stratification and potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures. This narrative review, based on a structured literature search, synthesizes the evolution of post-AD colonoscopy recommendations, presents current evidence, and highlights future research directions on alternative diagnostic methods and their potential to optimize patient care and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

colonic diverticulitiscolonic diverticulosiscolonoscopycolorectal cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID41975762
PMCPMC13073761

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.