ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Toxic Metal Content in Mexican Propolis: A Human Health Risk Assessment.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, arsenic, cadmium, lead, and manganese contamination in propolis was assessed. A total of 12 raw propolis samples were analysed using atomic emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma (ICP-OES) for each of the metals. The analyses revealed that the samples were contaminated with each of the following metals: arsenic (ranging from <0.21 to 0.4 ppm), cadmium (<0.008 to 0.123 ppm), lead (0.580 to 117.01 ppm), and manganese (4.22 to 47.57 ppm). Lead levels exceeded the acceptable limits for consumption. A chemometric characterization was performed, looking at the correlation between elemental contamination, showing high correlation between cadmium and manganese levels (r = 0.80). Furthermore, the samples with the highest contamination levels were in areas with high industrial and agricultural activity. A risk assessment for toxic metals indicated a risk associated with lead. While the amount of lead present in the propolis samples was deemed to pose a low carcinogenic risk, it is noteworthy that the levels of the other metals detected do not pose any discernible health risk associated with the consumption of propolis. This conclusion is crucial for understanding the safety profile of propolis as a dietary supplement or natural product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.