Evidence mapPaperPMID 41976421Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Toxic Metal Content in Mexican Propolis: A Human Health Risk Assessment.

Ana Paola Balderrama-Carmona, Leticia García-Rico, Ana Lilia López-Duarte, Melissa Valenzuela-Rincón, Luis Gerardo Ochoa-Balderrama, Guadalupe González-Ochoa, Lilian Karen Flores-Mendoza, Mario Eduardo Almada-Ortiz, Edgar Felipe Moran-Palacio, María Mercedes Meza-Montenegro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Paola Balderrama-CarmonaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa 85890, Sonora, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-3434
Leticia García-RicoLaboratorio de Contaminantes Metálicos, Coordinación de Ciencia de los Alimentos, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Hermosillo 83340, Sonora, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1618-2238
Ana Lilia López-DuarteLaboratorio de Contaminantes Metálicos, Coordinación de Ciencia de los Alimentos, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Hermosillo 83340, Sonora, Mexico.
Melissa Valenzuela-RincónDepartamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa 85890, Sonora, Mexico.
Luis Gerardo Ochoa-BalderramaDepartamento de Física, Matemáticas e Ingenierías, Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa 85890, Sonora, Mexico.
Guadalupe González-OchoaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa 85890, Sonora, Mexico.
Lilian Karen Flores-MendozaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa 85890, Sonora, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-1364
Mario Eduardo Almada-OrtizDepartamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa 85890, Sonora, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-7471
Edgar Felipe Moran-PalacioDepartamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa 85890, Sonora, Mexico.
María Mercedes Meza-MontenegroDepartamento de Biotecnología y Ciencias Alimentarias, Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, Ciudad Obregón 85000, Sonora, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, arsenic, cadmium, lead, and manganese contamination in propolis was assessed. A total of 12 raw propolis samples were analysed using atomic emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma (ICP-OES) for each of the metals. The analyses revealed that the samples were contaminated with each of the following metals: arsenic (ranging from <0.21 to 0.4 ppm), cadmium (<0.008 to 0.123 ppm), lead (0.580 to 117.01 ppm), and manganese (4.22 to 47.57 ppm). Lead levels exceeded the acceptable limits for consumption. A chemometric characterization was performed, looking at the correlation between elemental contamination, showing high correlation between cadmium and manganese levels (r = 0.80). Furthermore, the samples with the highest contamination levels were in areas with high industrial and agricultural activity. A risk assessment for toxic metals indicated a risk associated with lead. While the amount of lead present in the propolis samples was deemed to pose a low carcinogenic risk, it is noteworthy that the levels of the other metals detected do not pose any discernible health risk associated with the consumption of propolis. This conclusion is crucial for understanding the safety profile of propolis as a dietary supplement or natural product.

Indexed as

arseniccadmiumchemometric analysisICP-OESleadmanganeserisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41976421
PMCPMC13073304

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.