ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Improving the Reliability of Protein Folding Rate Predictions by Applying Guidelines for Validating QSAR/QSPR Models.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative structure-activity/property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) is a well-established methodology widely used to model molecular properties based on structure and is applied in fields such as drug design and environmental protection. The knowledge and procedures developed and used in QSPR modelling will be applied to the validation of protein folding rate models. Understanding the protein folding process is considered one of the most important scientific topics, and identifying the fundamental factors responsible for protein folding has been the subject of intensive research over the past 30 years. Among the structural descriptors determining the protein folding rate, the length of the protein sequence, the content of regular secondary structures, and the average contact row distance between amino acids in the 3D structure are the most important. Comparative studies of different methods for predicting protein folding rates are occasionally published, and we conducted one such study. We found that the experimental data in literature databases and the data available online are inconsistent and scattered. This is partly due to differences in experimental data and protein sequence lengths, but more so due to the questionable quality of the models themselves. We observed very large deviations in the predictions of ln(
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.