Evidence mapPaperPMID 41977337Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Pharmacological Management of Thrombosis: Current State and Future Strategies.

Andrzej Mogielnicki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrzej MogielnickiDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2406-5290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thromboembolic disorders remain a primary cause of mortality globally, with their burden expected to increase due to an aging population. While various antithrombotic agents exist, many patients still rely on traditional gold-standard drugs like heparin, warfarin, and aspirin, which present significant drawbacks. These include the need for injections, frequent monitoring, dietary restrictions, drug interactions, bleeding complications, or other adverse reactions such as thrombocytopenia. In contrast, direct oral anticoagulants offer advantages over warfarin, including fewer interactions and less need for continuous monitoring. However, even with newer drugs, patients face risks of major bleeding events. Current research focuses on novel antithrombotic agents with superior efficacy and enhanced safety compared to existing treatments. Researchers are exploring specific clinical niches, such as factor XI/XII inhibitors for cancer patients, to facilitate evaluation against standard treatments. The development of new antiplatelet drugs, like subcutaneous zalunfiban and selatogrel for pre-hospital therapy of myocardial infarction, and specific reversal agents, such as bentracimab for ticagrelor, exemplify this trend. Future research will likely focus on addressing the unmet needs of specific patient groups. This narrative review aimed to describe the current antithrombotic treatment and the most promising advances in the pharmacological management of thrombosis.

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsThrombosisAnimalsAnticoagulantsHumansAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsanticoagulantantiplateletheparinplateletsthrombosiswarfarin

Identifiers

PMID41977337
PMCPMC13073125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.