ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Integration of Bulk and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analyses in Biomedicine.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular classification and precision therapy in gastric cancer: Current advances and future perspectives (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Deciphering the Dysregulated Pathways and Candidate Therapeutic Compounds for Primary Ovarian Cancer Using Whole Transcriptomics Data and Next Generation Knowledge Discovery Strategies.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Identification and validation of key host genes associated with porcine H1N1 infection based on integrated machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Integrated Transcriptomic and Machine Learning Analyses Identify KCNN3 and TLR10 as Candidate Cell-Type-Associated Molecules in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Association Between Poliovirus Receptor (PVR/CD155) and Claudin Signaling Pathways in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptome profiling is a cornerstone of functional genomics, enabling the detailed characterization of gene expression in health and disease. Bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNAseq) remains the most widely used approach in clinical and large-cohort studies due to its cost-effectiveness, robustness, and comprehensive transcriptome coverage. However, bulk RNAseq inherently averages gene expression signals across heterogeneous cell populations, thereby masking cellular diversity and obscuring rare cell types. In contrast, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) enables a high-resolution analysis of cellular heterogeneity, allowing the identification of distinct cell types, transitional states, and developmental trajectories. Nevertheless, scRNAseq is associated with higher cost, limited scalability, increased technical noise, sparse expression matrices, and protocol-dependent biases introduced during tissue dissociation or nuclear isolation. In this review, we summarize the conceptual and methodological foundations of integrating bulk RNAseq and scRNAseq data, emphasizing their complementary strengths and limitations. We discuss how scRNAseq-derived cell-type atlases can serve as reference matrices for computational reconstruction (deconvolution) of bulk RNAseq profiles and examine key sources of technical and biological variability. Furthermore, we outline major integration strategies, including reference-based deconvolution, pseudobulk aggregation, and Bayesian joint modeling to provide an overview of widely used analytical tools and essential components of scRNAseq data processing workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.