ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Vertebra-Level Completeness Analysis in Thoracolumbar Ultrasound Using a YOLO-Based Detection Framework.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound enables radiation-free longitudinal monitoring of scoliosis, but rib shadowing and speckle noise often obscure vertebral structures. Current deep-learning methods present results in terms of localisation accuracy, without directly measuring anatomical completeness. We introduce a vertebra-level completeness model that includes a YOLO-based detection framework and an explicit representation of completeness, the Vertebra Presence Matrix (VPM). The VPM provides visibility into detections across 17 ordinal vertebral levels (T1-T12, L1-L5), allowing us to measure completeness across anatomy rather than just detections. Thoracolumbar ultrasound scans were annotated and divided into train/test sets using a patient-wise split to avoid data leakage. Four model variants were evaluated, including full-spine and vertebra-centric crop representations with single-class and 17-class detection heads. The full-spine detector was less stable in regions of high anatomical variability, such as the upper thoracic and lower lumbar spine. Crops of individual vertebrae were more stable under partial fields of view. The 17-class crop model achieved an mAP50 of 0.929 and a scan-level completeness score of 0.74 using the VPM. These results demonstrate that vertebral completeness can be explicitly quantified and integrated with localisation-based metrics for completeness-aware automated scoliosis evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.