Evidence mapPaperPMID 41978183Full record

ReviewNutrients2026

Circadian Timekeeping Through Nutritional and Metabolic Sensory Networks.

Erin N Doherty, Lauren N Woodie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin N DohertyDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0468-9672
Lauren N WoodieDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-4586

Funding

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation 33224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian rhythms are predictable biological patterns that recur about every 24 h and, in mammals such as humans, are entrained to daylight by the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Although light is a potent zeitgeber for the SCN, cells outside of the SCN can synchronize to daily nutrient and metabolic cues. In these tissues, nutrient metabolic processes are regulated by the molecular clock in anticipation of food availability or scarcity. Furthermore, nutrients and metabolic processes themselves may act upon members of the molecular clock to regulate their expression and activity. These interactions maintain synchrony between the SCN and food-entrainable clocks when activity and nutrient intake align. However, the light-entrainable SCN and food-entrainable clocks can become desynchronized, particularly in modern society where humans are commonly exposed to shift work and jet lag. Therefore, the mechanisms for sensing nutrients at specific times of day are critical components of circadian timekeeping and organismal homeostasis. In the following narrative review, we aim to synthesize current evidence on time-of-day-dependent nutrient sensing in mammalian systems, examine how nutrient-derived signals and metabolic processes interact with molecular clock mechanisms across cellular and tissue levels, and evaluate the integration of central and peripheral clocks in regulating gene expression, energy utilization, and organismal homeostasis, including the impacts of feeding cycles and circadian disruption. While previous reviews have discussed circadian nutrient metabolism, this review provides conceptual support for the role of nutrients as time-of-day signaling mechanisms.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksCircadian RhythmAnimalsEnergy MetabolismHomeostasisHumansNutrientsSuprachiasmatic Nucleuscircadian rhythmsmetabolismnutritionsensory

Identifiers

PMID41978183
PMCPMC13075158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.