ArticleNutrients2026
Ten-Year Trends in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Slovenia (2014-2023): Laboratory-Based Data from Tested Individuals and COVID-19-Period Changes.
Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamin D status is influenced by season, age, and public health messaging. The COVID-19 pandemic was accompanied by heightened interest in vitamin D, but long-term national data from Central/Eastern Europe remain limited. We aimed to characterize 10-year trends, seasonal variation, and demographic determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in Slovenia, with particular focus on changes during the COVID-19 period.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all serum 25(OH)D measurements performed at the Slovenian national reference laboratory between January 2014 and December 2023. The core analytic cohort included 106,875 patients with valid 25(OH)D results, aged 0-100 years. Vitamin D status was classified as deficient (<30 nmol/L), insufficient (30-50 nmol/L), adequate (50-75 nmol/L), and optimal (>75 nmol/L). Temporal trends, seasonal patterns, and age- and sex-specific differences were assessed using non-parametric tests and Kendall's τ.
resultsMean 25(OH)D concentration over the study period was 61.9 ± 34.2 nmol/L; 16.0% of patients were deficient and 22.8% insufficient. Annual mean 25(OH)D increased from 57.0 nmol/L in 2014 to 67.2 nmol/L in 2023, with a significant upward temporal trend and a 14.6% higher mean level during 2020-2023 compared with 2014-2019. Seasonal variation was pronounced (≈20% higher summer-autumn vs. winter-spring), and vitamin D status declined progressively with age, with the highest deficiency prevalence in patients ≥ 70 years. Females had slightly higher 25(OH)D than males, although absolute differences were small.
conclusionsThis laboratory-based analysis of tested patients showed higher 25(OH)D concentrations during and after the COVID-19 period, superimposed on persistent seasonal and age-related gradients. These observations identify older adults and winter testing periods as important contexts for vitamin D optimization, but they should be interpreted as descriptive trends among tested individuals rather than as evidence of causal pandemic effects or population-wide prevalence changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.