SynthesisImmunity, inflammation and disease2026
Safety and Efficacy of Obinutuzumab in Treating Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLupus nephritis (LN) is a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), often leading to end-stage renal disease. Despite current immunosuppressive therapies, complete renal remission remains limited. Obinutuzumab, a type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, offers enhanced B-cell depletion compared to type I antibodies and may improve renal outcomes in LN. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in treating adult patients with proliferative LN.
methodsThis review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251074418) and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinical trial registries was conducted through June 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing obinutuzumab vs. placebo in adult patients with biopsy-confirmed active LN. Primary outcomes included complete renal response (CRR), proteinuria, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Secondary outcomes included immunological markers and adverse events. Data were synthesized qualitatively due to the limited available trials.
resultsTwo RCTs (REGENCY 2025 and NOBILITY 2022) with 396 patients met the inclusion criteria. Obinutuzumab significantly improved CRR (46.4% in REGENCY at week 76; 41% in NOBILITY at week 104) and reduced proteinuria (UPCR < 0.5 in 62% vs. 37% in controls). Improvements in eGFR, complement levels (C3 and C4), and anti-dsDNA titers were also noted. Adverse events occurred at similar rates across groups, although serious infections and infusion reactions were somewhat higher in one trial. No significant increase in mortality was observed.
conclusionObinutuzumab appears to be a promising therapy for proliferative LN, offering enhanced renal response and immunological benefits. Its potential for long-term renal protection and steroid-sparing effects supports further investigation through large-scale comparative trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.