ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Review of Recent Advances in Implantable Brain-Computer Interfaces for the Restoration of Motor Function in Patients With Paralysis.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantable brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) - positioned at the intersection of neuromedicine and clinical neurorehabilitation - have achieved notable advances in restoring motor function for individuals with paralysis. By using invasive electrodes to directly sample cortical neuronal activity and translating these signals into control commands for external effectors, BCIs offer a viable therapeutic pathway for severe motor impairment. On the mechanistic front, steady improvements in neural signal acquisition and decoding have enabled more precise capture of movement intent and real-time control of robotic manipulators, exoskeletons, and functional electrical stimulation systems, thereby supporting partial restoration of motor function. Evidence from animal studies and early clinical investigations indicates that long-term implanted electrodes provide distinctive advantages in signal stability, spatial resolution, and the induction of neuroplasticity, which collectively strengthen basic mechanistic inquiry and translational application. At the application level, recent work combining high-density electrode arrays with deep learning-based decoding strategies has demonstrated near real-time, multi-degree-of-freedom control of hand and upper-limb movements. In parallel, hybrid interfaces integrating electroencephalography and electromyography, together with closed-loop neuromodulatory paradigms, further extend the rehabilitative potential of BCI systems. In summary, implantable BCIs show substantial promise for motor recovery in paralysis and are progressing from laboratory demonstrations toward bedside deployment. With continued convergence of materials science, artificial intelligence, and clinical neuroscience, BCIs are poised to play an increasingly pivotal role in improving quality of life and advancing the practice of neurorehabilitation. This article aims to review recent advances in implantable BCIs for the restoration of motor function in patients with paralysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.