Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978676›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal open2026

Synthetic artificial intelligence in cardiology: from generative models to clinical applications.

Gianmarco Parise, Roberto Ceravolo, Fabiana Lucà, Michele Massimo Gulizia, Cecilia Tetta, Orlando Parise, Federico Nardi, Massimo Grimaldi, Sandro Gelsomino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Myocardial mapping: anatomy in the era of digital cardiology.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gianmarco PariseCarim School for Vascular Disease, Synthetic Artificial Intelligence with focus on Cardiovascular Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6222 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-7299
Roberto CeravoloDepartment of Cardiology, Lamezia Terme Hospital, Via Senatore Arturo Perugini 1, 88046, Lamezia Terme Lamezia, Italy.
Fabiana LucàCarim School for Vascular Disease, MRI-based Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Imaging, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6222 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5369-5382
Michele Massimo GuliziaDepartment of Cardiology, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Piazza Santa Maria di Gesú 5, 95124, Catania, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-7125
Cecilia TettaExpert in Cardiovascular Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Via Ruggi 14, 40137, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-5592
Orlando PariseSynthetic Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Engineering, Universita della Calabria, Via Pietro Bucci, 87 036, Arcavacata, Cosenza, Italy.
Federico NardiDepartment of Cardiology, S. Spirito Hospital, Via Giovanni Giolitti 2, 15033, Casale Monferrato, Alessandria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-2587
Massimo GrimaldiDepartment of Cardiology, Acqua Viva Delle Fonti Hospital, VStrada Provinciale 27 Acquaviva Santeramo-km 4, 70021, Acqua Viva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-8884
Sandro GelsominoCarim School for Vascular Disease, Synthetic Artificial Intelligence with focus on Cardiovascular Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6222 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-989X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly redefining biomedical research-yet in cardiovascular medicine, its clinical relevance remains obscure, underexplored, and underestimated. Unlike traditional AI, which interprets data, synthetic AI generates entirely new, patient-like information: from realistic ECG signals to cardiac imaging and virtual cohorts that simulate disease progression. While recent publications have addressed specific synthetic AI tools in cardiology, no prior review has comprehensively synthesized their architectures, clinical applications, and implementation challenges within a single, practice-oriented framework. This State-of-the-Art Review fills that gap. We provide a clear, critical synthesis of core architectures-Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Diffusion Models, Transformers, Autoregressive Models, Digital Twins, and Synthetic Cohort Simulators-and map their emerging cardiovascular applications. We examine technical barriers, ethical concerns, regulatory uncertainties, and integration challenges, while anchoring the discussion in real-world clinical priorities. This review is not only a scientific analysis-it is a call to engagement. For academic researchers, it offers conceptual and technical clarity. For clinicians in resource-constrained settings, it presents synthetic AI not as abstract innovation, but as a practical opportunity to enhance diagnostic precision, optimize workflows, and extend clinical insight. Traditional AI supports cardiologists by interpreting data; synthetic AI extends this paradigm by creating new, clinically coherent information that enhances decision-making without replacing physician expertise. As investment grows and methods mature, cardiologists must shape this evolution-not as passive adopters, but as active drivers. This review invites them to take the wheel.

Indexed as

AEthical and Regulatory Challenges in AICardiovascular Data SimulationDigital Twins and Synthetic CohortsGenerative Models in MedicineSynthetic Artificial Intelligence

Identifiers

PMID41978676
PMCPMC13070426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.