Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978739›Full record

ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026

Natural Language Processing for Substance Use Disorder Information Extraction: A Systematic Literature Review.

Ransom J Wyse, David C Samuels, Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Lori Schirle, Bethany A Rhoten, Seo Yoon Lee, Alvin D Jeffery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ransom J WyseDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave., Suite 1575, Room 1410B, Nashville, TN 37203 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4558-1702
David C SamuelsDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3529-7791
Sandra Sanchez-RoigeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA.
Lori SchirleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-019X
Bethany A RhotenVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN USA.
Seo Yoon LeeVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-8061
Alvin D JefferyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave., Suite 1575, Room 1410B, Nashville, TN 37203 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2797-6508

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Synergy Core (SynC)P50DA054071 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI Daniel A Jacobson · 2022 to 2026
$13.1M
Framework to Accelerate Substance Use Disorder Genetic Studies through Customizable, EHR-Based Precision PhenotypingDP1DA056667 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Alvin Dean Jeffery · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
Building Bridges to Allow Cross-species Translational genetics for the Study of AddictionDP1DA054394 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANCHEZ ROIGE, SANDRA · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Variation in Home Opioid Consumption after Total Knee Replacement: Investigating the Role of Pain Sensitivity and Gene ExpressionK23NR020512 · NINR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIRLE, LORI · 2022 to 2024
$482k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026395NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA054394NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA056667NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054071NINR NIH HHS K23 NR020512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: To examine the use of natural language processing (NLP) for substance use disorder (SUD) information extraction. Recent Findings: 623 studies were reviewed, of which 35 met inclusion criteria. 1 paper (2.9%) was alcohol-related, 12 (34.3%) were opioid-related, 6 (17.1%) were tobacco-related, and 16 (45.7%) included multiple SUDs. Of the three types of NLP categorized for this analysis, 65.7% followed a Rule-Based approach, 37.1% followed a Machine-Learning approach, and 11.4% followed a Deep-Learning approach. NLP methods were categorized into three groups, with 43% as "Most common use" (e.g., concept extraction), 20-35% as "Regular use" (e.g., regular expressions), and < 10% as "Rare use" (e.g., sentiment analysis). Various software applications were used in each included paper, with Python leading (10 papers), followed by cTAKES (9 papers), NegEx (6 papers), R (4 papers) and others. Multiple evaluation metrics were used in each included paper; Multiple SUDs (6 papers) utilized a comparison of F1 scores and ROC AUC, followed by Tobacco (4 papers), Opioids (3 papers), and Alcohol (1 paper), each with acceptable-to-outstanding ROC AUC scores ( > = 0.7) and good-to-excellent F1 scores ( > = 0.7). Summary: Most papers included in this systematic review encompassed multiple SUDs following Rule-Based approaches, "Most common use" NLP methods (e.g. concept extraction), and familiar software applications (e.g. Python). Evaluation metrics for SUD papers utilizing NLP included common performance metrics, with ROC AUC and F1 scores achieving acceptable-to-outstanding discrimination between classes and good-to-excellent balance between precision and recall, respectively. The future direction of NLP for SUD information extraction could make use of Machine- or Deep-Learning approaches, advanced methods including Regular expressions or Sentiment analysis, and/or advanced software packages designed specifically for NLP endeavors, to better inform public health research and clinical decision making.

Indexed as

AddictionInformation extractionNatural language processingSubstance use disorderSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41978739
PMCPMC13070045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.