ReviewGlobal cardiology science & practice2026
Sex disparities in STEMI pathophysiology: Presentation, treatments, and outcomes.
Review in Global cardiology science & practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Clinical Profile, Revascularization and In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of Adverse Outcomes During 30-Day Follow-Up in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the declining rates of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and improvements in care standards, significant disparities between sexes persist among patients diagnosed with STEMI. This review summarizes recent and relevant literature that highlights the differences between men and women concerning STEMI pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, treatment protocols, diagnostic challenges, and outcomes. Many of these disparities interact, resulting in poorer outcomes for female patients with STEMI. However, there is hope through the adoption of evidence-based treatment plans.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.