ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Comparative analysis of prognostic scoring systems for cats with suspected pancreatitis (472 cats).
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious prognostic factors and schemes are proposed for use in cats with pancreatitis, but these have yet to be independently evaluated in a broad group of cats. HYPOTHESIS/
objectives(1) To compare predicted prognosis for death and prolonged (≥5 days) hospitalization across biochemical variables and composite schemes and (2) to calculate discriminatory ability for length of hospitalization. ANIMALS: Four hundred seventy-two client-owned cats with suspected pancreatitis.
methodsMulti-institutional retrospective study (2019-2024). Prognostic factors included potassium, feline pancreas-specific lipase, total bilirubin, total calcium, and total magnesium. Prognostic schemes retrospectively calculated were the Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE)full and fast, and the modified feline activity index (MFAI).
resultsTotal calcium (median: 9.3 [IQR: 8.7-9.9] vs 9.6 [IQR: 9.0-10.1] mg/dL, P = .03), APPLEfull (median: 41 [IQR: 35-46] vs 36 [IQR: 30-40], P < .001), APPLEfast (median: 20.5 [IQR: 14.5-27.0] vs 14.0 [IQR: 12.0-19.0], P < .001), and MFAI (median: 5 [IQR: 4-8] vs 4 [IQR: 3-6], P = .011) were significantly different between fatal and nonfatal cases. Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluationfast had the greatest area under the curve for case fatality (0.695; 95% CI, 0.617-0.773) while MFAI had the greatest concordance index with length of hospitalization (0.673; 95% CI, 0.639-0.706). Overall negative predictive values were high and positive predictive values (PPVs) were low for both case fatality and prolonged hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Composite scoring schemes appear to be of greater prognostic value than individual variables in cats with pancreatitis. Because of the low PPVs for case fatality and prolonged hospitalization, prognostic factors should be interpreted cautiously on an individual cat basis and should not serve as the basis of clinically consequential decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.