ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
How do you handle post-radiotherapy follow-up care? Results of a national pattern-of-care study.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-radiotherapy follow-up care (PFC) is an essential part of radiotherapy and a legal requirement under the German Radiation Protection Act. The aim of this national study was to analyze current PFC structures and concepts in Germany.
methodsA pattern-of-care study was conducted among all 366 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie (DEGRO)-registered radiotherapy institutions, whereby a 26-item questionnaire on organizational structures, patient selection, follow-up intervals, and the scope of examinations was completed anonymously online.
resultsA total of 95 institutions participated (response rate 26.6%; adjusted 30.2%). Almost all (99%) provide PFC, and 78% offer it regularly for oncology patients. In 84% of the studied institutions, PFC schedules are individually tailored according to the risk of radiation side effects and disease progression. The first follow-up visit occurs within 3 months in 94% of these institutions, and 72% offer PFC for 5 years. In 87% of cases, intervals are shortened for toxicities ≥ grade 3. Frail, very elderly, and palliative patients often receive a reduced PFC program. Telephone-based PFC is performed by 42% and written/digital approaches by 22% of institutions.
conclusionPost-radiotherapy follow-up care is firmly established in German radiotherapy practice and is partly tailored to the patient's individual risk based on radiation side effects and treatment intent. Most institutions adhere to the recommendations of DEGRO and SSK. Digital and structured tools are currently only used to a limited extent in practice. However, they offer considerable potential for future use in further personalizing and optimizing the quality of PFC, also with regard to the still necessary definition and/or harmonization of PFC content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41979666What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.