Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41979682›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2026

Membrane Biofouling: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives- An Overview.

N Phillip, A A Muleja, M M Motsa, B B Mamba, T T I Nkambule, C S Tshangana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N PhillipInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa.
A A MulejaInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa.
M M MotsaInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa.
B B MambaInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa.
T T I NkambuleInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa.
C S TshanganaInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, 1709, South Africa. tshansc@unisa.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane technology is a compelling alternative for addressing some water quality issues on a global scale. Despite the demonstrated success of membrane technology, biofouling remains a persistent problem in membrane filtration processes. The impact of biofouling compromises the application and efficiency of the filtration processes by shortening membrane lifespan, reducing permeate output, increasing the energy requirements, and increasing the transmembrane pressure. All these factors combined impact treatment plant operations. Biofouling is reported to contribute ~ 45% of all membrane fouling and between 20 and 30% of operating costs. This review critically examines the factors driving membrane biofouling and evaluates conventional mitigation strategies, highlighting their limited long-term effectiveness, high operational costs, and environmental drawbacks. Various technologies discussed in this paper have been developed to mitigate biofouling; however, due to the complexity and intractability of biofouling, their efficiency is limited. Hybrid systems are in part proposed as a sustainable antibiofouling approach to overcome the limitations of conventional biofouling mitigation technologies.

Indexed as

BiofoulingFiltrationMembranes, ArtificialWater PurificationMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID41979682
PMCPMC13079486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.