Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41980113›Full record

SynthesisCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

Nonpharmacologic interventions for managing distress, anxiety, and depression for patients with cancer and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lisa C Schiess, Lixin L Song, Sabine Schädelin, Thomas Fürst, Corinne Urech, Christopher R Friese, Maria C Katapodi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa C SchiessDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5175-6233
Lixin L SongSchool of Nursing, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8286-319X
Sabine SchädelinDepartment of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-0962
Thomas FürstUniversity Medical Library Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5186-3821
Corinne UrechDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-9661
Christopher R FrieseSchool of Nursing and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-2056
Maria C KatapodiDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-3750

Funding

Stiftung zur Krebsbekämpfung, SwitzerlandUniversity of Basel, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, School of Nursing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As more cancer treatments take place in outpatient settings, family caregivers provide essential care and emotional support over long periods. Unaddressed patient and caregiver psychological distress can lead to worse outcomes, reflecting the challenges of managing complex care demands in the home setting. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined how well nonpharmacologic interventions (NPIs) reduce distress, anxiety, and depression in adult patients with solid tumors and their family caregivers. The authors included 68 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 11,987 participants. NPIs were characterized as psychoeducation, therapeutic counseling, skills training, or behavior modification. By using random-effects models (Hedges g), they observed that NPIs significantly reduced patient distress at both 0.0-3.0 months (g = 0.13) and 3.1-6.0 months (g = 0.18), but NPIs did not significantly reduce caregiver distress. In the short term (0.0-3.0 months), NPIs also significantly reduced anxiety (g = 0.31 for patients; g = 0.15 for caregivers) and depression (g = 0.28 for patients; g = 0.25 for caregivers). Subgroup analyses examined the impact of patient and caregiver characteristics along with NPI type, delivery format, dose, and duration. NPIs delivered jointly to patients and caregivers yielded significant effects that were higher compared with NPIs delivered separately. NPIs can help manage distress in patients and reduce anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers. However, the lack of long-term follow-up limits our understanding of their impact on patients and caregivers with prolonged or delayed psychological symptoms (PROSPERO registration number CRD42024536629).

Indexed as

AnxietyCaregiversDepressionNeoplasmsPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalCounselingHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbehavior modificationdyadic interventionsheterogeneitymeta‐regressionpsychoeducationskills trainingtherapeutic counseling

Identifiers

PMID41980113
PMCPMC13078667

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.