Trial reportOpen heart2026
Chronotype-aligned exercise timing in middle-aged adults at cardiometabolic risk: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise timing as a potential temporal regulator of neurolymphatic physiology in neurodegenerative proteinopathies: a mechanistic framework.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether aligning exercise timing with chronotype enhances cardiometabolic and sleep-related benefits in sedentary adults with cardiovascular risk factors.
methodsIn this 12-week randomised controlled trial conducted in Lahore, Pakistan (January-June 2025), 150 sedentary adults (aged 40-60) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor were recruited and categorised as morning-type or evening-type using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire and validated by 48 hour core body temperature monitoring. Participants were randomised into a chronotype-aligned exercise (CAE) group exercising at their preferred time, or a chronotype-misaligned exercise (CME) group exercising at their non-preferred time. Moderate-intensity aerobic training (5 sessions/week, 40 min/session) was supervised. Primary outcomes included systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate variability (RMSSD); secondary outcomes included peak oxygen consumption (VO₂ peak), low density lipoprotein (LDL), fasting glucose and sleep quality (PSQI), assessed pre- and post-intervention.
resultsOf 150 randomised participants, 134 completed the study (CAE: n=64; CME: n=70). CAE led to significantly greater improvements in systolic BP (-10.8 vs -5.5 mm Hg, p=0.002), diastolic BP, RMSSD, VO₂ peak, LDL, fasting glucose and PSQI scores compared with CME. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant group×time interactions across all outcomes (eg, systolic BP: η²=0.095, p=0.005). The reduction in systolic BP in the CAE group was substantial and significantly greater than in the CME group.
conclusionAligning exercise timing with individual chronotype significantly enhances cardiometabolic and sleep-related outcomes in at-risk adults. Chronotype-based exercise prescriptions may offer a cost-effective, personalised approach to improving cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.