ArticleScientific reports2026
A multicentre benchmark dataset for comprehensive landmark-based fetal ultrasound biometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate fetal growth assessment from ultrasound (US) relies on precise biometry measured by manually identifying anatomical landmarks in standard planes. Manual annotation of landmarks is time-consuming, operator-dependent, and sensitive to variability across scanners and sites, limiting the reproducibility of automated approaches. There is a need for multi-source, annotated datasets to develop artificial intelligence-assisted fetal growth assessment methods. To address this bottleneck, we present an open-access, multicentre benchmark dataset of fetal US images with expert anatomical landmark annotations for clinically used fetal biometric measurements. These measurements include head biparietal and occipitofrontal diameters, abdominal transverse and anteroposterior diameters, and femoral length. The dataset contains 4,513 de-identified US images from 1,904 subjects acquired at four clinical sites using seven different US devices. We provide subject-disjoint train/test splits, evaluation code, and baseline results to enable fair and reproducible comparisons of methods. Using an automated landmark-based fetal biometry model on pre-selected standard planes, we quantify domain shift and show that training and evaluation confined to a single centre can overestimate performance relative to multicentre testing. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first publicly available multicentre, multi-device, landmark-annotated dataset that covers all primary fetal biometry measures, providing a robust benchmark for studying domain shift and multicentre generalisation and enabling more reliable AI-assisted fetal biometry across centres. All data and annotations are available on the UCL Research Data Repository . Training code and evaluation pipelines are available at https://github.com/surgical-vision/Multicentre-Fetal-Biometry.git .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.