ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel generalized orthopair fuzzy CURLI MCDM framework for smart art communication integrating emotional intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The capacity to identify, adjust to, and interact with human emotions has become a crucial component of effective art communication in digital and interactive environments. Measuring smart art communication through an Emotional Intelligence (EI) lens is not easy since human emotional reactions are unpredictable, biased, inexplicable, and hard to measure. To overcome this problem, this paper suggests a q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Collaborative Unbiased Rank List Integration (qROF-CURLI) multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model where uncertainty in expert judgments is modelled by a q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (qROFS) and the CURLI mechanism combines the rankings of individuals to produce a final and unbiased overall ranking. Expert linguistic assessments are converted into qROF numbers and aggregated to construct the decision matrix, after which the CURLI procedure produces the final ranking of alternatives. The applicability of the proposed framework is demonstrated through a decision-making case study related to smart digital art communication platforms, involving fifteen alternatives evaluated across nine criteria by four decision-makers. The criteria of benefits include Emotional Recognition Capability, Emotional Adaptability, Audience Engagement, Empathy Enhancement, Technological Integration, and Cultural Relevance, whereas the costs criteria include Implementation Cost, Technical Complexity, and Ethical Risk. According to the results, the gamified and AI-adaptive communication platforms receive the best rankings. The sensitivity analysis and benchmarking on the existing qROF-MCDM approaches prove the stability and reliability of the model. The suggested framework offers a usable support to assess emotionally intelligent digital art communication systems and offers a unique combination of CURLI rank aggregation with the MCDM using qROF in order to enhance the reliability of collective decisions that are made under uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.