ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Comparative plastome analyses reveal life-form-associated selection signatures in Orchidaceae.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrchidaceae, one of the largest and most ecologically diverse families of angiosperms, exhibits remarkable variation in life form and includes numerous species with significant medicinal and economic value. However, comparative analyses of plastomes across orchid genera—particularly those explicitly linking selection signatures to life-form divergence and evaluating their evolutionary implications—remain scarce. Therefore, systematic characterization of plastome structural variation and life-form-associated selective pressures has the potential to advance orchid conservation strategies, sustainable cultivation practices, and fundamental evolutionary understanding.
resultsWe conducted comparative plastome and phylogenetic analyses of 67 orchid species representing 15 genera to characterize plastome structure, selective pressures, and evolutionary relationships. The plastomes exhibited GC contents ranging from 24.75% to 39.16% and a distinct codon usage bias toward A/U-ending codons. Our analyses revealed lineage-specific variation in genome size, ndh gene loss, repeat content, and codon usage, with fully mycoheterotrophic orchids generally exhibiting more extensive genome reduction. Positive selection analyses uncovered life-form-associated patterns: positively selected genes in terrestrial orchids included atpI and rpl22, whereas those in epiphytic orchids included rpl22, rpoA, and rps2; no positively selected genes were detected in mycoheterotrophic orchids. Site‑level analyses further indicated that amino acid substitutions at residues 122 and 124 of Rpl22 may be associated with life-form divergence. Structural analyses revealed inversions, IR boundary shifts, and lineage-specific disruptions in genomic synteny. Phylogenetic reconstructions largely recovered the expected generic relationships, whereas anomalous placements—such as Dendrobium chrysotoxum Lindl. nested within Pholidota—may reflect historical hybridization or introgression.
conclusionThis study provides insights into the potential effects of life form on plastid gene evolution in orchids, highlights molecular selection patterns associated with ecological strategies, and establishes a comprehensive genomic framework for research on orchid systematics, conservation, and sustainable cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.