ArticleBMC cancer2026
Aspirin alters molecular crosstalk between prostaglandin, apoptosis, and invasion pathways in colorectal cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant cause of global cancer mortality. While aspirin demonstrates therapeutic benefits, the molecular determinants underlying patient response are poorly understood, hindering personalised treatment strategies. This study aimed to identify molecular subtypes in CRC based on prostaglandin pathway markers and assess their association with clinical outcomes and aspirin use.
methodsWe analysed paired tumour and adjacent normal tissues from 86 CRC patients (43 regular aspirin users, 43 aspirin-free) via qPCR for mRNA expression (PTGS1, PTGS2, PTGER2, PTGER3) and immunohistochemistry for protein levels (COX-2, Caspase-8, MMP-9). Normalised expression data were correlated with clinicopathological features and survival. Unsupervised clustering algorithms (K-means, hierarchical, and hybrid) were applied independently to each cohort to identify distinct molecular subtypes using Z-score-normalised data across all seven markers.
resultsAspirin-treated patients showed significantly higher PTGS2 and PTGER3 mRNA, elevated Caspase-8 protein, and reduced MMP-9 protein compared to the aspirin-free group. Unsupervised clustering identified distinct molecular subtypes within both cohorts. In the Aspirin-Treated group, clinical stratification yielded a two-subtype solution (AT-1, AT-2), primarily driven by differential protein expression (Caspase-8, COX-2, MMP-9), which demonstrated a trend towards distinct survival outcomes (P = 0.073). In the Aspirin-Free group, a clinically relevant two-subtype solution (AF-1, AF-2) demonstrated significant survival differences (47.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.016); the poor-prognosis subtype (AF-2) was characterised by higher PTGS2 mRNA, higher COX-2 protein, lower Caspase-8, and higher MMP-9 levels. Notably, strong correlations between PTGS2 mRNA and adverse clinical outcomes observed in the aspirin-free cohort were absent in the aspirin-treated group.
conclusionIntegrated prostaglandin pathway gene and protein expression analysis identifies distinct CRC molecular subtypes with prognostic significance, particularly related to aspirin use. Key protein markers (Caspase-8, COX-2, MMP-9) and PTGS2 mRNA levels differentiate these subtypes. Aspirin treatment disrupts specific molecular correlations linked to prognosis, suggesting modulation of post-transcriptional networks. These findings support the use of multi-marker molecular profiles to improve patient stratification and personalised aspirin therapy in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.