ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Clinical and translational science award hubs in learning health systems: development of the engine-drivetrain model.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge Traffic in Learning Health Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Organizational Phenotyping and Translational Governance.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Clinical and Translational Science Award hubs in learning health systems: evaluation framework of the engine-drivetrain model.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past two decades, biomedical research has made extraordinary progress, at amazing speeds and with astounding computational capabilities. Even in very agile organizations, these fast-paced advances represent significant barriers to nimble and successful implementation, scaling, integration, cultural shaping, and ongoing education. Learning at individual, team, organization or system levels is paramount to the good functioning of all health systems. MAIN BODY: Academic health institutions are uniquely positioned to drive innovation, improve patient outcomes, and cultivate future leaders by integrating well-managed clinical operations, breakthrough research, and outstanding education. The Learning Health System (LHS) framework provides a powerful model of integration, leveraging iterative cycles of discovery, learning and improvement by employing robust operational management, analytical capabilities, implementation and dissemination capacity and functionalities. Central to this model are three interconnected phases: Practice to Data, Data to Knowledge, and Knowledge to Practice, which form the ‘implementation arc’ or the LHS cycle. At each junction between these phases, the incorporation of external evidence and the active engagement of community members or stakeholders serve as critical pillars, ensuring that learning is both rigorous and relevant.
conclusionsFirst, we offer a modified design and conceptualization of LHS as a four-cycle, mission-based model centered by its community, and strengthened by external evidence and data as distinct inputs, at multiple points of the cycle. Second, we propose that the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs’ structures and functions can represent the strong operational engine of the LHS plant, while community represents the central axle and transmission of movement in the central mechanism of the LHS. As such, the CTSA hubs can serve as a robust machinery for the clinical, research, and educational cycles in learning health systems. RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.