SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Surgical approaches to esophageal cancer gastrointestinal reconstruction: a systematic review of jejunum, colon, and ileocolonic interposition with comparative outcome analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy of the digestive tract, with surgical resection remaining the cornerstone of curative treatment. For patients with an intact stomach, reconstruction using a gastric conduit via gastric pull-up is the preferred approach following esophagectomy. However, in cases where the stomach is unavailable—due to prior gastric surgery, polyps, or concurrent tumors—alternative conduits must be considered. By reviewing relevant domestic and international research literature, this review evaluates the indications, benefits, limitations, and common complications associated with jejunal, colonic, and ileocolonic interpositions. Additionally, strategies for the prevention and management of complications are discussed. By synthesizing the latest clinical evidence, we aim to provide practical recommendations to guide surgical decision-making and improve outcomes in the management of esophageal cancer. The jejunum, colon, and ileocolon represent the primary options for esophageal reconstruction, each offering unique anatomical and functional advantages as well as distinct technical challenges and complication profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.