ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Targeting MET in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: from molecular mechanism to precision therapy.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurosurgical Resection for De Novo Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Evidence for Multidisciplinary Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain metastases (BM) remain a major cause of morbidity and treatment failure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among actionable pathways, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) is clinically consequential not only as an oncogenic driver in a molecular subset of tumors but also as a convergent bypass route that mediates acquired resistance in the much larger EGFR-mutant population, making MET an important focus in the context of intracranial progression under targeted-therapy pressure. MAIN BODY: Available genomic datasets suggest a distinct distribution of MET alterations in BM, with MET amplification relatively enriched in intracranial lesions while MET exon 14 skipping is less frequent than in primary tumors. Mechanistically, MET signaling supports key steps of brain colonization, including trans-endothelial invasion across the blood-brain barrier, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and context-dependent adaptation to the brain microenvironments; evidence from other tumor types further reinforces these pro-metastatic programs. Precision management requires robust molecular profiling: RNA-based next-generation sequencing improves detection of splice events such as MET exon 14 skipping, while tissue and liquid biopsy (including cerebrospinal fluid-derived ctDNA when feasible) can capture intracranial clonal evolution. Clinically, selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., capmatinib, tepotinib) have demonstrated intracranial activity in small BM subgroups, and combination strategies, most notably dual EGFR/MET blockade using MET inhibitors or EGFR/MET-directed antibodies, are emerging as rational approaches for MET-driven resistance, although heterogeneous CNS endpoints and prior brain-directed therapies limit cross-study comparability. SHORT
conclusionMET is an actionable vulnerability in NSCLC-BM and should be considered beyond treatment-naïve MET-driven disease, extending to patients with acquired MET amplification during EGFR-TKI exposure. BM-dedicated trials with standardized intracranial endpoints and integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment are needed to optimize patient selection, sequencing, and resistance-informed combination strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.