Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41982307›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Energies and new technologies in pelvic and pelvic floor dysfunctions.

Adriana Bittencourt Campaner, Ana Lucia Ribeiro Valadares, Fabiene Bernardes Castro Vale, Letícia Maria de Oliveira, Lucas Schreiner, Lucia Alves Silva Lara, Lucia Costa-Paiva, Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori, Neila Maria de Góis Speck, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jármy Di Bella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adriana Bittencourt CampanerFaculdade de Ciências Médicas Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo São PauloSP Brazil Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-3019
Ana Lucia Ribeiro ValadaresDepartamento de Tocoginecologia Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Departamento de Tocoginecologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8416-6096
Fabiene Bernardes Castro ValeDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo HorizonteMG Brazil Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4920-0372
Letícia Maria de OliveiraDepartamento de Ginecologia Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São PauloSP Brazil Departamento de Ginecologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-0669
Lucas SchreinerPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto AlegreRS Brazil Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4444-9232
Lucia Alves Silva LaraDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo São PauloSP Brazil Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-238X
Lucia Costa-PaivaDepartamento de Tocoginecologia Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Departamento de Tocoginecologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-6700
Marair Gracio Ferreira SartoriDepartamento de Ginecologia Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São PauloSP Brazil Departamento de Ginecologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3001-6076
Neila Maria de Góis SpeckDepartamento de Ginecologia Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São PauloSP Brazil Departamento de Ginecologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3713-5393
Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jármy Di BellaDepartamento de Ginecologia Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São PauloSP Brazil Departamento de Ginecologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-3023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•Differences between laser, radiofrequency (RF) and microfocused ultrasound (MFU) energy-based devices (EBD). •Indication of energy-based devices in genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). •Indication of energy-based devices in urinary incontinence (UI). •What is known about the use of energy-based devices in sexual dysfunction (SD)? •Indication of energy-based devices in vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).

Indexed as

Pelvic Floor DisordersSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalUltrasonic TherapyUrinary IncontinenceFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41982307
PMCPMC13075998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.