ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2026
Impact of health information prescription in thyroid cancer.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Information prescriptions consist in making specific health care information available to patients on their disease from accredited sources, in order to help them understand and manage their disease, stimulating informed participation in health care. In the literature, a few studies have investigated the real effectiveness of prescribing information on the health management of oncological diseases. The scope of our pilot study was to investigate the effectiveness of information prescription, evaluating both patient satisfaction and perception, but also its possible impact on adherence to follow-up programs. Methods: Prospective pilot study enrolling patients with thyroid cancer. They received informative scientific material on thyroid cancer, dispensed by clinical librarians of the Institute's Library. Results: 101 patients were enrolled (81% were women with a total mean age of 49.39 years). 26% of patients accessed the institute's library receiving patient information materials. Comparing data of people who completed the project with those who did not, no differences in sex, age and tumour characteristics were found. We found no statistical differences in terms of adherence to follow-up visits between the two groups of patients, but health information was able to effectively respond to the requests or needs of most patients. Participating patients have improved awareness and knowledge of their disease, patient-doctor relationships, adherence to treatment and communication with family members regarding their disease status, with a final positive impact on one's psychological well-being and global satisfaction obtained in 65% of people. Conclusions: This is the first Italian study carried out in the field of oncological endocrinology, demonstrating the positive role health information has on patients' psychological health and thyroid cancer knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.