ArticleCardiology research and practice2026
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Mortality Risk in CKM Stage 0-3 Patients: Analysis of Inflammatory Mediation.
Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Mortality Risk in CKM Stage 0-3 Patients: Analysis of Inflammatory Mediation.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether socioeconomic status (SES) influences the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome stages 0-3 through the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). The investigation utilized a nationally representative sample from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database and employed mediation analysis for systematic assessment. Methods: Data were derived from NHANES surveys conducted between 1999 and 2018, enrolling adults who met the classification criteria for CKM stages 0-3. SES was defined by the stratified family income-to-poverty ratio (PIR), with SIRI serving as the mediator. The primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Methodological approaches included weighted multivariable Cox regression, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and bootstrap-based mediation analysis. Results: The study included 15,623 participants who were followed for a mean duration of 115 months, during which 1788 all-cause deaths and 405 cardiovascular deaths were recorded. After comprehensive adjustment for potential confounders, each unit increase in PIR was associated with a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.84-0.92) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95). Participants in the high SES group demonstrated substantially lower risks for both all-cause mortality (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47-0.69) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34-0.73) compared to their low SES counterparts. Notably, mediation analysis revealed that SIRI accounted for 63.67% of the association between SES and all-cause mortality, and 60.45% of the association between SES and cardiovascular mortality after full adjustment for confounding variables. Conclusion: SES significantly impacts the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among patients with CKM stages 0-3, with a substantial portion of this effect mediated through systemic inflammation as measured by SIRI. These findings suggest that comprehensive interventions targeting both socioeconomic conditions and chronic inflammation may effectively enhance long-term health outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.