ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Engaging in a dialogue with the Luton Roma community on access to healthcare services and co-producing solutions.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Healthy Ageing in Place for Roma Communities: Insights from Knowledge Café Workshops in the UK.Journal of cross-cultural gerontology · 2026Article
- Engaging in a dialogue with the Luton Roma community on access to healthcare services and co-producing solutions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Luton, a super-diverse town in the East of England, is home to one of the largest Roma populations in the UK. Roma communities experience significant health inequalities, particularly in accessing healthcare services, contributing to poorer health outcomes. However, there is limited research on effective ways to engage Roma communities and address these disparities. This study aimed to explore the views of the Luton Roma community on accessing healthcare services and to co-develop solutions. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using eleven focus groups with 64 participants. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Thematic Framework Analysis. Findings: Three main themes emerged. First, key health concerns included maternity and child healthcare, dissatisfaction with emergency care, long waiting times, and perceived quality of care. Second, barriers to access comprised limited knowledge of services, language difficulties, the need to travel to Romania for care, and perceived discrimination from providers. Third, suggested improvements focused on raising awareness of services, providing language support, and ensuring culturally competent, compassionate care. Gender and age shaped healthcare experiences. Women emphasised caregiving responsibilities and communication challenges, while men highlighted work-related pressures and system-level issues. Younger participants faced digital literacy challenges, middle-aged adults navigated caregiving demands, and older participants reported cumulative discrimination and distrust. Conclusion: Improving healthcare access for Roma communities requires systemic, rights-based interventions addressing language, discrimination, and structural obstacles, rather than expecting individuals to adapt. Policy actions should include professional interpretation, culturally competent care, anti-discrimination mechanisms, and active Roma involvement in service design. Improving health-seeking behaviours among Roma communities requires attention to age and gender dynamics, as socially constructed gender roles and life-course experiences shape health perceptions, caregiving responsibilities, and engagement with healthcare services. Community-led models, such as Roma health mediators, are essential for building trust, bridging communication gaps, and promoting equitable health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.