SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Effectiveness of aquatic Tai Chi on balance indicators: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Balance disorders expose older adults to an increased risk of falls. The combination of Tai Chi and an aquatic environment may improve balance. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of Ai Chi in improving balance in older adults. Methods: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Criteria: population individuals aged ≥60 years with balance disorders or at risk of falling; intervention Ai Chi (Tai Chi in water); control no intervention or other exercises; outcomes balance measures. The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EBSCO databases were searched without time restrictions for RCTs and quasi experimental studies. Study selection and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two authors. Results: Seven studies (6 RCTs, 1 non-randomized) with a total of 213 participants were included. Ai Chi programs lasted from 2 to 12 weeks (2-3 sessions/week). All studies showed an improvement in balance in the Ai Chi groups compared with controls. A significant improvement in static and dynamic balance (shortening of TUG time) was observed in the Ai Chi groups. In one study, only Ai Chi participants achieved a TUG score below the fall-risk threshold. Ai Chi proved to be as effective as land-based exercise and aquatic kinesiotherapy. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Ai Chi effectively improves balance in older adults, which may reduce the risk of falls and improve mobility. It is a safe, low joint-load form of exercise recommended as an adjunct to geriatric physiotherapy. A limitation is the small number of studies of moderate quality. Further large-scale RCTs with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the long-term effects of Ai Chi. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, Identifier (CRD420251162371).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.