ArticleExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2026
Rethinking delivery routes: oral administration of plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles reduces the toxicity of intravenous injection.
Article in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent progress of plant-derived extracellular vesicle-like nanoparticles integrated with biomaterials for skin repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Plant-Derived Nanovesicles: A Comprehensive Review from Isolation to Clinical Translation-Unlocking Natural Nanocarriers for Biomedical Applications.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles (PELNs), as an emerging "green" nanoplatform, exhibit broad pharmacological activities, low immunogenicity, and inherent advantages as natural drug carriers. They show great potential in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and health supplement sectors. The clinical application of PELNs is heavily contingent on their safety profile, which is intricately linked to the administration route. This opinion compares the safety implications of the two primary routes: oral administration versus intravenous injection. Current evidence indicates that intravenous administration of PELNs triggers complement activation, immune responses, and hepatorenal toxicity; even surface engineering modifications cannot completely eliminate these risks. In contrast, oral administration of PELNs may achieve superior safety by leveraging the gastrointestinal tract's ability to effectively reduce the immunogenic components. Based on these findings, we advocate for the prioritization of oral delivery in the future development of PELNs, given its superior safety profile for realizing their potential as natural therapeutics and drug delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.