ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2026
Priming strategies to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-derived vesicles in regenerative medicine.
Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Mitigate Ischemia-Induced Energetic Dysfunction During Ex Situ Perfusion of Rat Livers.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Priming-Dependent Modulation of Secretome in Placenta- and Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells: Toward Cell-Free Immunoregenerative Therapies for Osteochondral and Degenerative Joint Diseases.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as promising acellular therapeutics in regenerative medicine, offering a safer and more controllable alternative to whole-cell therapies. Their therapeutic efficacy, however, is highly dependent on their molecular cargo, which reflects the physiological state and environmental conditions of the parent MSCs. Priming of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) with defined stimuli such as hypoxia, inflammatory cytokines, 3D culture systems, biomaterials, or pharmacological agents has been increasingly employed to enhance extracellular vesicle (EV) bioactivity. These strategies modulate EV content, enriching vesicles with regenerative, immunomodulatory, angiogenic, and antioxidant factors. For instance, hypoxic priming activates hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-driven gene expression, promoting the packaging of angiogenic and anti-inflammatory molecules, while cytokine-based priming upregulates immunosuppressive proteins and regulatory microRNAs. Similarly, 3D culture mimics aspects of the native tissue microenvironment, augmenting the secretion of EVs with enhanced reparative potential. Emerging combination-based approaches synergize these effects, generating EVs with superior therapeutic profiles. Despite encouraging preclinical data, translation to clinical application is challenged by variability in MSC sources, priming conditions, and EV isolation methods. Standardization of protocols, validated potency assays, and regulatory harmonization are critical for clinical advancement. This mini-review summarizes current priming strategies, the underlying mechanisms influencing EV cargo, and their functional implications in disease models, while highlighting key barriers and future directions for the clinical translation of primed MSC-EV therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.