ArticleContemporary clinical trials2026
Approaches to screening and enrollment in clinical trials for seriously ill older adults in rural Appalachia.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecruiting participants for clinical trials in rural regions is challenging due to geographic isolation, transportation barriers, limited healthcare infrastructure, and longstanding mistrust of research. An NIH-funded randomized controlled trial (RCT) is underway to evaluate a nurse-led home care intervention for patients with advanced heart failure (HF) in rural Appalachia. PURPOSE: This paper describes systematic strategies for screening, recruitment, and enrollment of older adults with HF and their primary caregivers in rural settings.
methodsRecruitment occurs through outpatient HF clinics and referrals from faith-based nurses native to rural counties in West Virginia. Strategies emphasize cultural sensitivity and community engagement, including comprehensive staff training, proactive outreach, flexible scheduling, and IRB-approved incentives.
resultsEight months after IRB approval and staff training, 66 families have enrolled, representing 64.7% of the target enrollment goal. Enrollment is ongoing and progressing as planned. Challenges include unclear HF diagnoses in medical records, missing caregiver contact information, and communication barriers such as outdated phone numbers and reluctance to answer unfamiliar calls. These issues are addressed through systematic documentation, repeated follow-up, and leveraging trusted community networks. DISCUSSION: Culturally tailored, community-based approaches effectively mitigate enrollment barriers in rural populations. Collaboration with local clinic staff and faith-based nurses fosters trust, improves access, and supports retention of participants with serious illness. Structured processes grounded in cultural understanding and local partnerships are essential for successful trial implementation in rural Appalachia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.