ArticleScientific reports2026
Math and verbal fluency across adulthood provide insights into aging and individual differences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life expectancy is increasing, leading to a growing population of older adults. Although cognitive functions decline with age, mathematical functioning in later adulthood has received relatively limited research attention. The present study examined age-related changes in mathematical fluency across all four basic arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) to determine whether aging affects these operations uniformly or whether specific operations show greater vulnerability. We also examined how individual differences contribute to math fluency in older adults, and whether mathematical and verbal fluency show similar patterns of age-related decline. Fifty-two participants (young and older adults) completed math fluency tasks using both an oral test and the Ben-Gurion University Math Fluency test (BGU-MF), a computerized paradigm measuring accuracy and reaction times. Verbal fluency was assessed using semantic and phonological verbal fluency tasks. Results showed that older adults demonstrated lower math fluency in both formats, but operations were not equally affected: division and subtraction showed the largest age differences, while addition was relatively preserved. Among older adults, education emerged as the strongest predictor of performance, while time since retirement negatively predicted accuracy and number of exercises solved. Verbal fluency also declined with age, though to a lesser extent than math fluency, pointing to a broader age-related reduction in fluency abilities alongside a heightened vulnerability of arithmetic processing. Together, these findings suggest that while fluency relies on partially shared domain-general mechanisms, mathematical fluency—particularly in more demanding operations—shows disproportionate age-related sensitivity, with consistent effects observed across computerized and oral math formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.