ArticleScientific reports2026
GPU-accelerated modeling of biological regulatory networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complex regulatory dynamics of biological networks can be succinctly captured using discrete logic models. Previous work has shown that global optimization schemes are well suited for finding state transition logic and kinetic model parameters, in what are typically large and irregular solution spaces where even relatively small networks represent search spaces exceeding 1040 possible solutions. Powerful computing strategies are required to make this modeling practical for in silico pharmaceutical research. Here, we present a benchmark study quantifying the speedup achieved using a GPU framework in the regulatory logic modeling of two biological networks spanning an order of magnitude increase in complexity and several orders of magnitude in search space size. GPU implementation resulted in a 33%–57% reduction in wall time over multi-thread CPU and a 33%–1866% increase over serial CPU while also delivering better quality solutions in many cases. Evaluation on an even larger pathogen-host immune regulatory network suggests that migration to GPU may support convergence in less than 12 h for established models of immune signaling and less than 6 days for networks describing neural transmission in animals. These results offer a first scalability benchmark for regulatory logic modeling of biological networks, making the latter a potentially attractive approach for practical in silico hypothesis generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.