Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986766›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Evidence-steered medicine in oncology: network-aware micro-combinations that safeguard standard of care and potentially improve benefit-risk.

Konstantin Gurbanov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Konstantin GurbanovIndependent Researcher, Meinekestrasse 2, 10719, Berlin, Germany. konstantin.gurbanov@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1191-6055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard oncology regimens often follow a dose-optimization paradigm: intensify a single agent until efficacy emerges or toxicity intervenes. Yet many targets sit in compensatory tumor-host networks that reroute around pathway pressure, while incremental efficacy may plateau as dose rises and toxicity escalates. Clinical reality is further complicated by heterogeneous patient states, including suppressed antigen presentation (e.g., β2-microglobulin loss or antigen-processing/presentation machinery defects), immature or poorly trafficking dendritic cells, and symptom/toxicity burdens that drive dose delays or reductions and erode relative dose intensity. These factors contribute to late-stage monotherapy failures and leave clinicians with a binary choice-more of the same therapy or a complete stop-when the actionable question is often whether a small, precisely timed change could restore the preconditions under which standard-of-care (SoC) therapy works best. Evidence-steered medicine (ESM) proposes a conservative adjunctive framework that adds only tiny, single-pulse exposures ("micro-adjuncts") without delaying or displacing SoC. Each micro-adjunct is pre-specified with a directional mechanistic hypothesis and read out by short-horizon proxies at 48-96 h (e.g., HLA-ABC and TAP1/2 for antigen presentation; CD86/CCR7 for antigen-presenting-cell activation and trafficking readiness; hs-CRP for systemic inflammatory tone; HRV and symptom scores for host readiness). ESM enforces three safety-first gates: a mechanistic sign-consistency check; a transportability/overlap screen to avoid out-of-support exposure; and a banded decision rule that acts only when the pessimistic bound of the expected proxy effect exceeds a preset threshold under strict exposure caps, otherwise defaulting to NO-STEP. Governance features-drug-drug interaction matrices, order-set blocks, one-click rollback, and degrade-to-rules when calibration drifts-aim to convert combination experimentation into an auditable, risk-minimizing bedside layer. This review synthesizes the rationale for micro-dosed, order-aware adjuncts, summarizes implementable class-level candidates using approved agents and routine assays (with investigational items restricted to protocol settings), and outlines an evaluation plan embedded in care that prioritizes feasibility, safety, and mechanistic informativeness while protecting SoC delivery.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEvidence-Based MedicineMedical OncologyNeoplasmsStandard of CareHumansRisk AssessmentAntigen presentationCombination therapyDendritic cellsEvidence-steered medicineMechanistic biomarkersMicro-dosingRelative dose intensitySafety-first decision supportTranslational oncologyTransportability

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.