Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986957›Full record

ReviewEndocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)2026

Anabolics in Cancer Patients: To Use or Not to Use?

A Ram Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A Ram HongDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. wanilove23@nate.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With improving cancer survival, the management of osteoporosis in cancer survivors has become increasingly important. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss and aging place many survivors at high risk of fragility fractures. Anabolic agents, including parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor agonists and the anti-sclerostin antibody romosozumab, effectively stimulate bone formation and reduce fracture risk in the general population. However, their use in cancer patients remains limited because of safety concerns and insufficient clinical evidence. Preclinical studies suggested a potential risk of osteosarcoma with PTH analogues and possible effects on tumor growth or bone metastasis through modulation of the bone microenvironment, although long-term human studies have not demonstrated an increased malignancy risk. In clinical practice, PTH analogues are generally avoided in patients with active malignancy, bone metastases, hypercalcemia, or a history of osteosarcoma. In selected cancer survivors with a sufficiently long diseasefree interval, their cautious use may be considered depending on recurrence risk. Romosozumab may represent another potential option, although supporting evidence remains limited. Overall, the use of anabolic therapy in cancer patients should be individualized, carefully balancing fracture risk against potential oncologic safety concerns.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsNeoplasmsOsteoporosisAnimalsBone NeoplasmsFractures, BoneHumansAnabolic AgentsAnabolic therapyBone metastasisFractureNeoplasmsOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID41986957
PMCPMC13172635

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.